GolfStinks

A Golf Blog for the Rest of Us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Most Popular
  • Categories
    • Stinky Golfer Paradise
    • Golf Life
    • The Pro Tours
    • Reviews
    • The Economics of Golf
    • Golf Growth & Diversity
    • Health & Environment
    • Golf Destinations
  • Golf Terms
  • Newsletter

The New Breed Of Golf Official

May 6, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | Leave a Comment

Imagine you’re watching a baseball game.  Let’s say it’s around the seventh inning or so, and the umpires suddenly call a timeout and gather in discussion off to the side of the field.  A few minutes later it’s announced that back in the fourth inning there was a balk that the umpires missed and the penalty needs to be enforced.  So now, the runners on second and third jam your pitcher got out of unscathed earlier is not to be.  The other team is awarded the run they would have had due to the runner on third base, and now it’s a whole new ball game.  Does this sound ridiculous?  Absolutely.  Now imagine how much more ridiculous it would sound if the umpires themselves had nothing to do with it.  Rather, someone watching the game on TV called it in.

As ridiculous as it sounds, we all know what happened with Tiger at The Masters.  But did you know it happened again this weekend?  That’s right, this time to Sergio Garcia.  Apparently, Sergio marked his ball on the green, but didn’t put it back exactly from where he picked it up.  And once again, it took someone watching on TV to call a penalty. OK, once is a fluke.  But twice in three weeks?  This makes me wonder a few things:

1. If I was to notice a rules violation, who the heck would I call?  I get that in the Tiger incident, the caller was a former rules official, so he probably had a direct line to the guys at the tournament.  But just some average, everyday TV viewer…I wouldn’t know where to start!  Do I call the network?  Do I call the course?  And who would I even ask for?  What would I say?  “Hi, my name is Stinky Golfer Chris and I’d like to report a rules violation I just saw on TV.”  Yeah, because that sounds legit.

2. If it’s taking television viewers to call in after catching violations, how much are the officials missing that we (and they) don’t know about?  In my opinion, these violations were pretty blatant.  Seriously, you mean to tell me Tiger didn’t know he couldn’t drop his ball three or four feet away from his original spot?  Or Sergio didn’t realize he was putting his ball in a different place than where he marked it?  C’mon now.  Yet, no one on the course caught these at the time?

3. If they are legitimate mistakes made by the players, and they are completely unaware, how can you penalize them after the fact?  I would think a two-stroke penalty after the fact hurts more because it would affect the decisions the player would make had they known at the time.  My feeling is that once the player takes his next stroke, it’s too late.  The officials should have caught it then.

4. How does this happen in the first place?  If I’m playing with my buddies, we all notice if someone obviously puts their ball where it doesn’t belong?  We don’t call each other on it, but it’s noticeable.  If we see it, how don’t the people who are paid to?  What exactly are the officials looking at?  This isn’t a fast paced game that’s hard to keep up with.  We’re not talking an NBA game here.  We’re talking golf.

So two incidents in three weeks.  Is it just a fluke?  Or is it going to become a glaring flaw in the way golf tournaments are monitored and officiated.  I’d like to think it’s a fluke.  I mean, mistakes happen.  It could be just a couple of errors occurring close together.  But  either way, after two quick incidents, it may be time for the PGA to step in to try and prevent a third.

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: baseball, golf official, golf stinks, golfstinks, pga, sergio garcia, the masters, tiger woods

What I Took Away From The Masters

April 15, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | 3 Comments

For starters, I guess it was a pretty great tournament.  I didn’t take the time to watch much more than a few minutes of the final round (for the most part, I got my updates from ESPN), but I’ll take everyone’s word for it.  Lot’s of stories – a 14-year old makes the cut, Tiger’s two-stroke penalty, a dramatic playoff win…lots of stuff to talk about.  But I don’t want to do that.  Everyone is going to be talking about the obvious stuff.  Instead, I have a couple of questions.

Let’s starts with the 14-year old.  We’ve asked before if it’s good to have a kid playing in a tournament when a 16-year old played in the 2011 U.S. Open.  But a 14-year old at The Masters?  Are you kidding?  This kid’s mother was packing his lunch and meanwhile he’s keeping pace with Phil Mickelson at Augusta!  Great story, but my question is the same as it was two years ago – when a 14-year old is going stroke-for-stroke with some of the greats of the game, does that cheapen the sport or, at least, the tournament?  Does it make you look at the pro’s with a little bit less respect?

My next two questions though involve the Tiger controversy.  I’ll start with the ruling itself.  So everyone was hung up on the “as closely as possible” part of the rule.  The only real voice of reason I heard was from Curtis Strange when he said that as closely as possible could be determined as 6-8 inches – not 3-4 feet!  I have to agree.  When I hear “as closely as possible” I think “right beside.”  So to stand 3-4 feet behind where your shot was, you’re opening up a can of worms.  I mean, where is the “as closely as possible” line drawn?  What if his original shot was on a downhill lie and he then dropped 3-4 feet back onto a flat part of the fairway?  What then?  Would that be fair?  Would that be judged differently?

Even further…how is this giant loophole left open by the rule-makers?  How can you leave something like that up to interpretation?  If someone else did the same thing but moved 3-4 feet closer, is that the same?  What if they moved 6-8 feet one way or the other?  That certainly isn’t as close as possible either.  But…that’s all up for debate I guess, right?

But the whole controversy brings me to another issue.  Why is it that this day in age, with all of the officials, rangers, scorekeepers, etc. on the course that the player is responsible for keeping his own score?  Granted, we all keep our own scores when we play, but this is the pros, man.  Every professional sport has an official scorekeeper.  Why not golf?  A golfer is expected to sign his scorecard (in a designated area mind you) and remember the entire round?  Why wouldn’t an official be doing that for him?  This sport really needs to move out of the dark ages and update some of their rules.  It’s just silly and leads to stupid controversies such as this that take away from the game itself.

And just on a side note…inputting a rule to protect the players who don’t know the rules is absolutely ridiculous.  Seriously, is this a professional sport, or is it me and my buddies playing on a Sunday morning at the local muni?  If you’re going to play the game, you’d better know the rules.  Ignorance is not an excuse.  In the NFL, if a player doesn’t know something he did is a penalty, do the refs say “Oh, you didn’t know?  OK, well then instead of a 15-yard penalty it’ll just cost you five.”  If an NBA player didn’t realized he traveled before hitting a layup, do they let him keep one of the two points?  Of course not!  The rule is enforced!  They don’t implement another rule because the guy didn’t know!

We’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – for a sport that shouldn’t be nearly as complicated as it is, the rule-makers sure do their best to make it that way.  I mean, if you need to have a rule book, and then a separate book to, more or less, decipher the rule book…you have a problem.  This all boils down to the reason I don’t carry, don’t own and have never even thumbed through the rules of golf…nor do I have any plans to do so.  You could drive yourself nuts!  Don’t drive yourself nuts – know the basics and play for fun.

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: 14 year old at Masters, augusta, Curtis Strange, espn, golf stinks, golfstinks, Guan Tianlang, NBA, nfl, Phil Mickelson, rules of golf, The Masters, the masters, tiger woods, U.S. Open

A Masters Party…Yeah!

April 5, 2013 | By Pete Girotto | 2 Comments

Is this how you'd envision a party for The Masters?
Is this how you’d envision a party for The Masters?

As the Masters gets closer I’ve been thinking; Why not have a Masters party! Normally, when we associate throwing a party for a sporting event it’s usually the Super Bowl. It’s time to change that. I understand baseball and basketball could have scheduling conflicts with their championships because they are best out of 7 and fall on any given day. Not golf, my friend.

Golf tournaments start on Thursday and 99% of the time end on Sunday. It’s a set schedule we can plan around. As an added bonus there are 4 majors. That’s 4 opportunities if you ask me. It couldn’t work out any better especially considering the warmer weather during golf season.

So how does this thing go down? It’s simple, just like in golf we can approach this like a hack, amateur or pro.  As a hack,  you invite your buddies over on Sunday, throw out some grub and play drinking games that coincide with the tournament. For instance, when Tiger or whoever misses the fairway, you drink. As an amateur,  you follow the same outline as a hack but the festivities run from Saturday to Sunday. Also, you class it up a bit.  You know, have different flavor wings instead of just Buffalo and maybe a couple imported beers as well.

As a pro, it is our job to perform as such. We must adhere to very strict rules. So, following the basic outline of an amateur, we again raise the standard. No paper plates, plastic cutlery or plastic glasses. We begin on Monday and continue to Sunday. This includes “practice rounds” and the tournament. Most importantly, we are pro’s, a green jacket must be worn the whole week.

I think I’m on to something here…

Hit’em long…yell FORE!!!

Filed Under: Stinky Golfer Paradise Tagged With: amateur, hack, party, pro, Super Bowl, The Masters, tiger woods

Nike Golf’s Dynamic Duo Party Put On Hold

January 21, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | 2 Comments

If that picture to the left doesn’t speak for a look of frustration, then I don’t know what does.  It’s not that they’re in trouble, but let’s just say Nike’s new dynamic duo is off to a bad start.  After promoting Tiger and Rory leading up to their first tournament together as the brand’s stablemates, things couldn’t have possibly gone worse for Nike.  Once both were sent packing before the weekend, questions immediately began piling up.   

Now I know there are simply Nike-haters out there.  Many people call Nike bullies, say that they make an inferior product or that they charge too much money simply because they can, not because the product is worth it.  Those people have got to be laughing their butts off right now.  But it’s certainly a bit early to write them off, no?

I think Nike had a couple of ideas in bringing on Rory.  More than just signing the current top player as well as what should be considered the future face of the tour, I’m sure they also know that Tiger’s skills and dominance are certainly fading.  So now’s the perfect time to transition the face of Nike golf from Tiger to Rory.  Tiger put Nike Golf on the map, and now it will be Rory’s job to keep it there.  In the meantime, while Tiger is still one of the top players, why not get the most out of both of them while they can?  But when both fail to make the cut in their first tournament, one can see how many would begin to question the Nike product, especially when Rory has already supposedly tossed aside the Nike putter and gone back to his old one.

But one tournament is certainly not enough to judge anything.  It’s not like either of them hasn’t missed a cut before.  And they certainly will miss more.  It’s simply the timing and the fact that they both missed the cut in the same tournament.  So what do you say we give them a little more time.  But if this somehow becomes a pattern, then you can start to say that something is wrong at Nike. 

Swing ’til you’re happy!             

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: golf stinks, golf tournament, golfstinks, Nike Golf, rory mcilroy, tiger woods

Is The Demand For Tiger Woods Waning?

January 14, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | 5 Comments

About a year ago I was first made aware of the “appearance fee” some golfers (in this case Tiger Woods) will charge just to show up to a tournament.  I was on the fence about the idea at the time, and still am a year later. 

Back then I wondered whether this was a good idea.  I wondered if the tournament could be taken seriously if you have to pay players just to show up.  But I also wondered, if the PGA is never going to put together a meaningful tournament schedule with the ultimate goal being a season ending championship, would this be a good idea for many smaller tournaments with the intention of drawing bigger crowds?   One would think it could certainly help.  But if events from last week are any indication, maybe some tournament organizers are shying away from this practice.

Tiger Woods’ game may not be what it once was, but the name still carries much weight.  Having Tiger at your tournament would obviously draw bigger crowds therefore collecting more at the gate.  But how much is he going to cost?  And will his asking price be worth it?  Apparently, the organizers at the Qatar Masters have decided no, it isn’t worth it. 

Tiger Woods wants $3 million just to show up to the tournament.  So whether he gives a half-hearted effort or not, he gets that money anyway…even if he doesn’t even make the cut!  So maybe Qatar just doesn’t see the value in Tiger anymore. They’re not willing enough to shell out the money to have the game’s most polarizing figure there. 

I’ve heard it mentioned that a country (or state) as small as Qatar can’t afford to spend that type of money for one player.  But this is an oil-rich country with one of the highest GDP’s per capita in the world.  They can afford it.  So what then?

Maybe they really don’t see the value anymore.  Maybe they don’t want the media baggage that comes along with Tiger.  Maybe they simply don’t want to shell out the money for a guy who may not want to be there to begin with.  Maybe a trend is starting…

Swing ’til you’re happy!             

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: GDP, golf stinks, golfstinks, PGA, Qatar, Qatar Masters, tiger woods

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Awards

Badges Badges Badges Best Mens Blogs Badges

Advertisements

GPI


 


Archives – Read all 1,000+ GolfStinks Posts!

Blogroll

  • Aussie Golfer
  • Black Girls Golf
  • Devil Ball Golf
  • Front9Back9 Golf Blog
  • Geoff Shackelford
  • Golf Blogger
  • Golf For Beginners
  • Golf Gear Geeks
  • Golf Girl's Diary
  • Golf News Net (GNN)
  • Golf Refugees
  • Golf State of Mind
  • Golfgal
  • My Daily Slice of Golf
  • Pillars of Golf
  • Ruthless Golf
  • The Breakfast Ball
  • The Grateful Golfer
  • UniqueGolfGears.com

Questions / Advertise

info@golfstinks.com

Disclaimers

See here

Privacy Policy

See here

Copyright © 2009-2024 GolfStinks.com - All rights reserved.