GolfStinks

A Golf Blog for the Rest of Us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Most Popular
  • Categories
    • Stinky Golfer Paradise
    • Golf Life
    • The Pro Tours
    • Reviews
    • The Economics of Golf
    • Golf Growth & Diversity
    • Health & Environment
    • Golf Destinations
  • Golf Terms
  • Newsletter

The Economics of Golf

How is the golf industry doing financially? Who's investing? Is the game growing? Are Millennials playing enough? This section is about the overall health of the golf industry.

Finding the Future of Golf

May 3, 2016 | By Greg D'Andrea | 8 Comments

future of golf
What will golf be like when he grows up? (Photo by Greg D’Andrea)

Finding the future of golf isn’t going to be easy. There are many who are concerned the younger generation is embracing golf in far too few numbers. And there are many who are concerned current players are quitting the game in far too large numbers.

Then there’s the reality that more golf courses are closing than opening these days – a trend that’s been ongoing for the past several years. Industry experts call this “market correction” – the idea that the game grew too big during the “Tiger era” and is simply downsizing appropriately. Regardless, this still means less jobs in the industry.

And speaking about less jobs, what about the retail side of golf? It was a pretty ominous sign when in 2014 Dick’s Sporting Goods canned all of the PGA-certified pros it had working in its golf departments. In fact, Dick’s blamed the economy, less people playing, too many products flooding the market and a downward trend in their overall golf equipment sales.

All this pretty much sums up to one thing: The industry as we know it is getting smaller, not bigger. But does this mean golf is dying or simply changing?

I for one am fairly confident golf is changing – and changing for the better. We’ve seen many ideas tossed around recently on how to change the game for the better: Top Golf (nightlife driving range/game), Hack Golf (the people behind those giant golf holes), WRGA (relaxed rulebook for recreational players). All of these take-on the mission of getting more folks interested in golf.

One area of change that is starting to catch-on is booking tee-times online. Last year, we conducted a poll asking if tee-time sites might be actually hurting golf by undercutting prices too much. But the results showed more than half of you (53%) thought not. Only 36 percent were concerned, while 11 percent of you said the jury was still out.

I recently interviewed the co-founders of a growing golf tee-time site that basically is the kayak.com of golf – it brings together all the big golf tee-time sites (like GolfNow, etc.) and aggregates them in one place. The first of such websites in the golf industry, the duo (Jonathan Wride and Ryan Ewers of Supreme Golf) provided some very interesting statistics regarding online tee-times.

For example, 25 percent of golfers book tee-times online. Compared to the travel industry (where 65% of consumers book online) that may not seem like much. But by conducting their own research using data from both industries, Messrs. Wride and Ewers were able to determine golf is about where the travel industry was a dozen years ago in terms of online bookings. And golf is growing at a faster pace: Just last year the industry was 14 years behind (so online tee-time bookings are growing twice as fast as online travel bookings did during its infancy).

In fact, Mr. Wride is confident the market will continue to grow at a decent pace. He cited a recent Forbes article that shows Millennial participation is up on the successes of young new pros like Jordan Spieth. And this article, that shows these PGA young guns are credited with boosting golf’s TV ratings in 2015 – especially on CBS, which has suffered severe declines in recent years.

Interestingly, Supreme Golf’s founders say the majority of their current users are older than Millennials. This suggests the online tee-time market will grow exponentially as the younger generation coming into the game now is far more comfortable with doing things from their browser and/or phone app.

That is, of course, provided there are enough Millennials to replace all the Baby Boomers currently on the links. In this regard, perhaps the “market correction” I mentioned above is a good thing for golf after all. Not dying, just changing.

If we put all the pieces together, we might be getting a glimpse of what the future of golf will look like. Maybe gimmicky things like giant holes won’t really catch on, but there surely is a need to make the game easier and faster. To this end, new recreational golf rules and 12- or 14-hole golf courses just might catch the attention of a younger generation. Meanwhile, aggregated online tee-times sites like Supreme Golf already exist and will soon undoubtedly be the way the majority of golfers book times.

I’d venture to say the future of golf is already here. It might not be golf exactly as your grandfather or ever father knew it, but there will most definitely be golf.

Filed Under: The Economics of Golf Tagged With: #growthegame, golf industry, jordan speith, supreme golf

Help The Game Of Golf; Spend Your Birthday On The Course

July 20, 2015 | By Chris Chirico | 1 Comment

1471956_772546839428973_1731289230_n
The GolfStinks crew from left: Stinky Golfers Pete, Chris, Tom & Greg

Many times we’ve talked about some gift ideas for golfers, but we usually reserve that for around the holidays.  Every once in a while though, we’ll throw in a mention of golf birthday gifts or courses that have used a free round of golf on your birthday as a promotion.  We’ve recommended clubs, balls, equipment and clothing.  But it’s funny…we very rarely recommend simply a round of golf itself.

So my birthday was yesterday.  And as expected, a round of golf was on someone else – my oldest son in this case.  Lucky enough to have my birthday fall during golf season here in the northeast (thanks mom & dad!), it seems that once a year I manage to find a way to get a free round of golf.  Whether it’s my stinky golfing buddies or my stinky golfing kids, going back over the last few years at least, a round has been one of my birthday gifts.

We take our friends and family out to dinner or out for a few drinks for their birthdays.  We’ve suggested buying our golfing family members and friends some golf clothing or equipment.  So why not just take them golfing?  I like to use my golfing time for more than just playing golf.  We all like to use the time to hang out with our buddies while enjoying the game we all love.  We don’t always need more “stuff” for our birthdays.  Some of us just want to hang out with the people we love and enjoy spending time with, while doing something we all enjoy – so how about some golf?

As the golf industry as a whole continues to struggle, maybe part of the answer is to focus a bit more on the game itself rather than the clothing or high-end equipment that goes along with it.  After all, it’s the golf courses that are closing their doors, not the golf equipment or clothing manufacturers.  If you can help by taking your friends or family members golfing rather than buying them a polo shirt, then besides spending some quality time while playing a game you all enjoy anyway, doesn’t that help the golf industry as a whole?  After all, if the course closes, then all the equipment you have isn’t going to matter.

Filed Under: The Economics of Golf Tagged With: birthday, birthday golf, free golf

Golf in the Future: What will it be Like?

February 23, 2015 | By Greg D'Andrea | Leave a Comment

The Future of golf
What will the future of golf look like? (photo by Buck via Flickr)

The game of golf is in a period of transition – that much we are sure of. Reports show participation is down, courses are struggling (if not closing their doors altogether) and retail sales are lagging.

While some golf authorities are remaining calm, attributing the current climate to market correction after years of industry overgrowth, many others believe it will take significant change to right the ship.

Those worried over what they see as obvious signs of golf’s forthcoming demise are scrambling to find fixes. But what are we fixing? Well, that’s a rather broad topic – golf is too hard; too slow; too expensive. While solutions have been proposed for all of these issues, many of these fixes change the game somewhat.

The reality is, if some of these ideas catch on, golf as we know it today might be totally different in just a quarter century from now. Imagine you’ve been transported 25 years into the future…to the year 2040. Here’s what your round of golf might be like…

You step-out onto the first tee at 9 o’clock…at night. It seems the idea behind TopGolf spills-out to the actual course. Behind you is a fully-stocked bar teaming with patrons. You place your beer in a cup-holder next to the ball-washer and approach the glow-in-the-dark tee markers. You tee-up (both ball and tee are also glowing) and drive the ball towards a giant illuminated target in the middle of the fairway – the bulls-eye being the 150-yard marker.

It’s easy to follow the flightpath of your approach shot as it careens through the air like a shooting star towards the green, the flagstick and flag lit-up like a tree on Christmas. You pull-out your putter and promptly drain a 40-foot putt for birdie. Of course, the hole is 20 inches in diameter (HackGolf’s original 15-inch cup idea is adapted for nighttime).

Hole #2 is a par 3 with a pond and trap flanking the green and a portable bar flanking the tee-box. There’s also the closest-to-the-pin contest going on, where the winner from your foursome gets a free shot from the bar and the overall winner for the evening gets three free rounds of golf (it’s not uncommon for the ball closest-to-the pin to actually be in the hole, and thus have several overall winners for the evening).

Hole #3, a par 5, features the obvious long-drive contest, where prizes range from free drinks to free golf depending on how far you can hit it. Each level is conveniently marked in the fairway: 300-325 yards has grass glowing red; 325-350 the grass glows blue; and 350-375 glows yellow (both free rounds and drinks beyond that). If you think these distances seem a bit far for average golfers, it’s only because no one abides by the USGA rulebook anymore…so using non-conforming equipment (balls, clubs, etc.) is the norm.

Walking off the 3rd green takes you back to the bar/clubhouse area, where you’re free to join the merriment on the dance floor or make the turn to play the back 3 holes. Yes, most new golf courses by 2040 are only 6 holes long. With less to maintain, courses can lower prices while still raking-in boatloads of cash from the main bar, plus the three additional portable bars out on the course.

Those golfers still wishing to play during the day can do so, albeit without the cool glow-in-the-dark effect. Plus, plenty of kids are being introduced to the game as it’s not uncommon for parents to rent-out a course for birthday parties, etc. And daytime is also when the course is used by FootGolf enthusiasts – a game that has gotten extremely popular by 2040.

In addition to the lower greens fees, the time it takes to play has been drastically reduced as well. No more wife or hubby ranting about you being gone all day. Instead, a 6-hole round takes 90 minutes (give or take your time at the bars). And rarely are there backups on the tee – with the holes being so big and the equipment being so forgiving, most average golfers have single-digit handicaps in the future.

OK, let’s time machine back to the year 2015 and think about what we just read. Sure, I took some liberties in illustrating golf’s future, but am I really that far off? Regardless if the current economic woes of the game dissipate on their own, we’re going to see some changes. TopGolf, HackGolf and even a rulebook for recreational golfers already exist in the here and now. Not to mention non-conforming equipment that corrects your slice and allows you to hit it farther are also already on the market. Plus, the idea of creating golf courses with less than 18 holes isn’t a new idea either.

This all being said, I don’t think I would mind a future that looked similar to what I imagined above. I may opt for less night rounds and expand the courses to 12 holes instead of 6, but I think a new rulebook for average golfers, bigger holes and non-conforming equipment can make the game more fun for recreational players (not-to-mention more profitable for courses and the industry as a whole).

Whether this comes from glow-in-the-dark night rounds; incorporating a bar/club atmosphere; making the game easier for average hacks; or something else entirely, the bottom line is golf has to change with the times. I think one thing is clear – there is a vast gap between serious golfers (and that small percentage of players who are talented enough to be pros) and the rest of us. It’s high time we start playing a different game of golf.

Filed Under: The Economics of Golf Tagged With: hackgolf, night golf, polara golf, rules of golf, slow play, topgolf

POLL: Are Tee-Time Sites Killing Golf Courses?

January 21, 2015 | By Greg D'Andrea | 2 Comments

Booking tee-times online has become extremely popular...
Booking tee-times online has become extremely popular…

I have one golf buddy who won’t play unless he gets a deal on his greens fees via a service like GolfNow. According to him, you’re crazy to pay full price when there are third-party websites out there virtually giving away open tee-time slots. And he’s not alone.

Many golfers these days are drawn to services like GolfNow in an effort to save money. In fact, GolfNow has gotten so big (it’s now part of the NBC Sports family) it’s suggested the company controls nearly half of the online tee-times in the U.S.

As a result, many in the golf industry are nervous these tee-time services are undercutting prices too severely, which might ultimately be detrimental to golf courses in general. True, GolfNow helps fill times for courses that would otherwise remain empty, along with providing digital tee-time logs instead of the old tee-sheet clipboard system – services many local mom and pop courses appreciate. But some who have considered the long-term market effects are beginning to grow concerned.

Handing customer relationships over to a third-party site is one potential problem. And coupled with the rock-bottom prices in general, golfers will begin to expect discounts everywhere (as with my buddy who is mentioned above), thus weakening the integrity of greens-fee prices within the market.

Seeing as it’s nearly impossible to ignore consumer demand, could this new lower-cost pricing model for greens fees ultimately put some courses out of business? For some course operators, using third-party tee-time sites, like GolfNow, has become a damned if they do, damned if they don’t situation. A recent in-depth piece from The Wall Street Journal (see here) captures this conundrum rather well.

This all being said, what are your thoughts on third-party tee-time websites? Are they ultimately good or bad for the golf industry? The poll and comments section are at your disposal…

Are Tee-Time Sites Killing Golf Courses?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Filed Under: The Economics of Golf Tagged With: golf courses, golf now, poll, tee times

Should We Pay by the Hour to Golf?

December 3, 2014 | By Greg D'Andrea | 5 Comments

clock on the golf course
What if being put “on the clock” resulted in higher greens fees? (photo by Greg D’Andrea)

Recently, long-time golf blogger and all-around good guy Ryan Ballengee made an intriguing statement on his site Golf News Net: “Want to improve golf’s pace of play problem? Charge by the hour.”

Pointing to the game’s slow play problem and the ever-increasing time it takes to finish a round of golf, Mr. Ballengee stated:

“You know what will speed up play? Attaching a dollar value to time spent on the course. […Courses] should charge an hourly rental fee. It can be structured around the quality of the course, time of day you’re playing and the expected average time to play the course at that time of day.“

So if it’s currently taking 5 hours to play 18 holes, then the price can be set at say $8/hour. Whereas if it’s taking just 4 hours, the hourly rate might be $10. In either case, you’re paying $40 to play 18. The catch is hoping foursomes pick-up the pace to get through in less time, thus saving the players money and keeping the pace of play swift. Another example would be charging $8/hour when the course is playing slow (say 6-hour rounds) and $15 when it’s playing in 4-hours. In that scenario, would it be worth it for some people to pay $12 more to finish two hours earlier?

Getting more complex, Mr. Ballengee suggests courses could create dynamic pricing – that is pricing that fluctuates depending on a number of variables including pace of play, weather, tee-time availability, etc. He even floats an option that the price could change mid-round to give “some incentive to a snail’s pace group to get moving.”

While all this sounds plausible, Mr. Ballengee says it’s not that simple: “One group could still ruin everything by lollygagging their way around the links.” To combat this, he recommends a time ceiling should be set…say 6 hours. If a group is out there for more than 6 hours, they should be (after a warning or two) asked to leave.

This is where I’m left wondering if this idea could really work. I mean, kicking the slow group off the course might take care of the immediate problem, but to me it’s a short-term gain, long-term loss. Those guys won’t be back…ever. And maybe 3 of the 4 weren’t even the problem. Maybe they were paired-up with a slow-poke. Is it fair to get kicked off just because you got stuck playing with a snail (or a newbie who might even quit the game after such an experience)?

In addition, who wants to play with the added pressure of being on the clock? We’ve proposed a shot clock in golf before, but that was for the pro tour…not for the recreational golfer. Look, I play golf to relax and have fun. The thought of some ranger driving up with a Square payment system on his iPhone to swipe my credit card because I just hit the 5-hour mark but only paid for 4, kinda rubs me the wrong way, you know?

But in any event, Mr. Ballengee has at least thrown-in his proverbial two-cents on how to solve the problem of slow play. And to be completely honest, I think this is one of the more feasible (albeit still somewhat flawed) proposals I’ve heard thus far. What are your thoughts on this “pay by the hour” solution? The poll and comments section are at your disposal…

How do you feel about paying by the hour to golf?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Filed Under: The Economics of Golf Tagged With: golf news now, greens fees, on the clock, poll, slow play

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
  • Next Page »

Awards

Badges Badges Badges Best Mens Blogs Badges

Advertisements

GPI


 


Archives – Read all 1,000+ GolfStinks Posts!

Blogroll

  • Aussie Golfer
  • Black Girls Golf
  • Devil Ball Golf
  • Front9Back9 Golf Blog
  • Geoff Shackelford
  • Golf Blogger
  • Golf For Beginners
  • Golf Gear Geeks
  • Golf Girl's Diary
  • Golf News Net (GNN)
  • Golf Refugees
  • Golf State of Mind
  • Golfgal
  • My Daily Slice of Golf
  • Pillars of Golf
  • Ruthless Golf
  • The Breakfast Ball
  • The Grateful Golfer
  • UniqueGolfGears.com

Questions / Advertise

info@golfstinks.com

Disclaimers

See here

Privacy Policy

See here

Copyright © 2009-2024 GolfStinks.com - All rights reserved.