GolfStinks

A Golf Blog for the Rest of Us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Most Popular
  • Categories
    • Stinky Golfer Paradise
    • Golf Life
    • The Pro Tours
    • Reviews
    • The Economics of Golf
    • Golf Growth & Diversity
    • Health & Environment
    • Golf Destinations
  • Golf Terms
  • Newsletter

Off Course – The Poster-Boy For All That Is Wrong With Sports

July 12, 2010 | By Chris Chirico | 6 Comments

Lebron James (photo by David Shankbone / CC BY 3.0)
Lebron James (photo by David Shankbone / CC BY 3.0)

Normally, we here at Golfstinks do our thing a little differently. We tend to approach the game of golf from a slightly different angle than most others. And today is no different.

But today, I am not going to approach the game of golf at all. Just for this one post, I want to express my opinion about something else going on in the world of sports. Rather, something that went on a few days ago.

I have come to accept the fact that most athletes, superstars especially, be it a team sport or not, are more “Me, me, me” than “Team, team, team.” But never (in my opinion) in the history of professional sports was it so blatantly obvious as it was with the recent LeBron James spectacle. Being a fan of all three major sports in the U.S., I was completely and utterly disgusted by the show Lebron James has been putting on for some time now. And it all came to a head on this past Thursday night. But I don’t want to put all of my disgust into only Lebron. It was much more than that.

It wasn’t necessarily about greed. Latrell Sprewell (who was already making over $14 million) turning down a $27 million contract, stating that he “has a family to feed” is greed. Patrick Ewing, during an NBA lockout, asking how the owners can expect them to work for the pay they are receiving as he hops into his $100,000 Mercedes, is greed. Not LeBron. He actually took less money to play elsewhere. It’s not about the money. It’s a different kind of greed.

I understand players marketing themselves. I get that. When their face is on TV, they make more money. And who doesn’t want more money? But again…this was different. I’ll start with the man himself.

Here’s a guy who is, arguably, the best player in the NBA. Personally, I don’t believe he is, I just believe he has the best statistics. But he has yet to win anything. In his seven years so far, he has reached the finals once – and was swept. But year in, and year out, it’s all about LeBron. And year in and year out, LeBron goes home empty-handed. The “King” has yet to wear a crown. Has he elevated the status of the Cleveland Cavaliers? Certainly! Have they become a much more respected franchise? Absolutely! But does that give him the right to string them along like he did? Does that give him the right to string along the people who have supported him from game 1…the always forgotten fans?

The Cavaliers have given LeBron everything he wanted. He was paid huge amounts of money. His image plastered all over the city. He wanted different players on his teams roster, and ownership went and got them. What LeBron wanted, Lebron got. But he still couldn’t get the job done. So what does he do? He parades teams in to present offers. He sets up a 1 hour TV special to showcase his decision. And he accepts the offer made by the team that will make it the easiest for him to win. And he made this decision, admittedly, without having the common courtesy to let his former team in on his decision. Don’t you think that would have been the decent thing to do? At the very least, a phone call. I can’t imagine a bigger slap in the face to the team that did everything for him. I’m sorry LeBron…but Michael Jordan didn’t need a TV special. Kobe Bryant didn’t need a TV special. And those two have actually won something. Carlos Boozer signed in Chicago, no TV special. Joe Johnson resigned with the Hawks, no TV special. Dirk Nowitzki resigned with Dallas, no TV special. Amare Stoudemire signed with the Knicks, no TV special. Chris Bosh signed with the Heat…, well…no direct TV special.

But as I mentioned, it’s not only LeBron. How about ESPN’s role in this? I mean really…was a 1-hour special necessary? I’ll admit, I tuned in until he said where he’s going. Then I changed the channel. That’s all I needed to hear. Here’s a message for ESPN – “I don’t want to hear LeBron’s feelings. I could care less. I want to watch a game! Put on a friggin’ game!” I know I am not alone when I say ESPN, intentionally or not, has helped to create the “I in team” thinking. We watch basketball highlights and all we see are dunks and threes. We watch baseball highlights and all we see are home runs and spectacular catches. We watch golf highlights and all we see is Tiger Woods. And the golf highlights are the worst! Its Tiger, Tiger, Tiger, and…”oh, by the way, so-and-so is winning…Tiger is five back of the leader.” According to ESPN, if Tiger is playing, then no one else is even worth mentioning until they have to be mentioned!

ESPN sucks up to the athletes. There, I said it. They can’t give serious sports news or an objective opinion because they are in bed with too many athletes. It’s that simple. And this LeBron James special proves it. This was not ESPN looking for an exclusive interview. This was LeBron and his representatives coming to ESPN with this idea. And ESPN, looking for ratings, soaked it up. This is a disappointing all-time low for ESPN. But wait, I have one more…

I have lost all respect for Jim Gray. How can I, or anyone, ever take him seriously again. For Jim Gray to agree to be just a pawn in this spectacle should be an outrage to anyone who considers themselves to be a good journalist. There was one question on everyone’s mind…and Jim Gray loaded us with a bunch of fluff, filler and outright crap before he got to it. “How’s your summer?” Are you serious?! “How’s your summer?” is one of your questions?! I swear if I ever see that putz on my TV again, I am instantly changing the channel. I don’t care if he’s interviewing one of my family members…they can fill me in later. This was worse than when the Yankees were telling the YES network’s Kimberly Jones which questions to ask Joe Torre during her interviews. It was just pathetic.

I know what LeBron James was trying to do. But it seriously backfired. The only people right now who probably don’t believe that, are Miami Heat fans and LeBron fans who believe he can do no wrong. Everyone else, sports purists especially, are looking at Lebron James as selfish, narcissistic, back-stabbing, and a coward. Me included. And it’s too bad because I like LeBron. But after all this, I’m just sick of him. He comes across as a player who feels he is bigger than everyone and everything else. At this point, I don’t want to see him win a championship. I hope Cavaliers owner Dan Gilbert is right. I hope they do win a championship before LeBron does. As long as it’s not against my Lakers, then it’s OK with me.

In my opinion, LeBron James came out of this event representing almost everything that is wrong with sports and athletes today. There is no two-ways about it. He looked bad. Plain and simple. He looked bad. People will say that once he wins a championship, all will be forgotten. Well, try telling that to people in Cleveland.

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: athlete, ESPN, Jim Gray, LeBron James, NBA, tiger woods

Records, Shmecords…Cut Me My Check.

July 10, 2010 | By Pete Girotto | Leave a Comment

checkbook-688352_1280
On tour you can finish next to last and still get paid!

In what other sport can you have a record of 2-13 and get paid for not winning? Just ask Ernie Els; the #1 ranked golfer on the money list.

As Henry Hill had put it in the movie “Goodfellas”; “Business bad? F#@$ you pay me!” Golfing bad? You got it, pay me. You know, “bad” might not be the right word. He is on the tour. So maybe “Golfing and not winning all the time?” but you get the point…

Just think about how great a system that is. It’s almost like: Hey, we know you haven’t won a major yet so here’s a way to be ranked and noticed. PLEASE NOTE: In no way, shape or form am I taking away from Els. He’s one of my favorites along with Lefty, who is #2 in the world and #2 on the Money List.

Could you imagine if top MLB pitchers like Johan Santana, Cliff Lee or Josh Johnson were to have a record of 2-13. Would you expect any bonuses coming their way? Maybe a surprise – a set of keys to a new Porsche in his locker from his agent? Probably not. They would be seeking help medically, mentally or even from a witch doctor deep in the Congo to get them out of that slump.

From a marketing standpoint, a money list is another great way to feature and give recognition to great golfers that may not be winning all the tourneys but are placing in the top 10 fairly consistently. Should this actually be the list that proves who is number one in the world? Last time I checked, Tiger was #1 in the world and Els was #6. I guess the world rankings use your current and previous year to give you a ranking. So, if you were #1 last year and haven’t really played much this year, you can still be #1…hmmmm.

The next thing these top money earners have to do is play in more events. That’s my only request for these guys. I understand you have families and have to spend time with them, but you are a pro tour golfer and role model. One or two extra tourneys a year wouldn’t hurt.

Just my $0.02…hit’em long, yell FORE!!!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: cliff lee, ernie els, johan santana, josh johnson, Money list, PGA money leaders, tiger woods

U.S. Open…For Business?

June 18, 2010 | By Pete Girotto | Leave a Comment

Will this year's U.S. Open help golf? (photo by Bernard Gagnon / CC BY-SA 3.0)
Can this year’s U.S. Open help golf? (photo by Bernard Gagnon / CC BY-SA 3.0)

O.K., normally I don’t write much about what’s going on with the pro tours, but after a quick look at the leader board for the U.S. Open, the top five names threw me off a bit. I double-checked and made sure it was the U.S. Open Leader Board, it was, and then it hit me – I know these results were only through the first round, but is this a sign of change?

Don’t get me wrong, I know Tiger is very well capable of coming from behind (no pun intended) and winning. And Phil, man what’s happening? Here’s a quick look of the top five so far:

1. Shaun Micheel USA
2. Paul Casey ENG
3. Brendon de Jonge ZIM
4. Alex Cejka…who? GER
5. Ryo Ishikawa JAP

Does this look like a U.S Open leader board? Will the fave’s make the cut? I’m really looking forward to seeing how this plays out. It’s a little bit of change from all of this World Cup Soccer (no offense to soccer, I’m also a fan). Not to mention, I wonder how much of an impact either sporting event is having on each other (something tells me the football tourney is having more success – even here in the states)?

Anyway, maybe this U.S. Open will open the doors for some new names (God knows the tour could use them). I’m pretty sure I’m not the only one who doesn’t recognize some of the players in the lead, but is that good or bad for the PGA? Stinky Golfer Chris posted the other day that the tour is trying to woo more fans – will this no-name leaderboard help it, or will it send it reeling even father than it currently is?

Time will tell, but I for one am more interested than ever! Not-to-mention, they’re out there on beautiful Pebble Beach playing golf…it doesn’t get much better than that. F@#$in’ beautiful!

Good luck no-names – I’m pulling for ya!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: Pebble Beach, phil mickelson, tiger woods, u.s. open, us open

The PGA Tour Decides To Get More Fan-Friendly. Gee…Thanks.

June 14, 2010 | By Chris Chirico | 1 Comment

Lefty is one of the good guys on the PGA Tour... (photo by Corn Farmer / CC BY 2.0)
Phil Mickelson is one of the good guys on the PGA Tour… (photo by Corn Farmer / CC BY-ND 2.0)

I checked out a Devil Ball post a few days ago regarding the PGA deciding to make some “fan-friendly” moves. While I believe that any sport making an attempt to become more fan-friendly is great, I can’t help but to think to myself – “Yeah, we’ll see.”

Fact: No major sport is more out of touch with its fans than PGA. See that picture of Lefty? It’s him and a handful of other guys (if even that many) who show any real appreciation for the fans that show up to the events. What is the PGA planning to do about that? What good is trying to get a few more big names to some smaller tournaments if they are just going to ignore the fans there also?

Few sports put the spectator closer to the competitors than golf. But there is so little fan interaction that it just doesn’t matter. Is it really that hard to, at the very least, acknowledge the fans? Is it that hard to look at the fans and say “Thank you” after they’re cheering on a nice shot? I mean, it’s not an NBA game where you have to hurry back down the court to play defense! Acknowledge the fans! All you’re doing is walking down the fairway anyway!

But it’s not only the on-course actions of the players. It’s also the lack of pre- and post-round interaction. What Jay Busbee wrote in that post is 100% on the money. Most of these guys hurry past the fans like they’re carrying some rare, incurable disease! Don’t these guys realize, if not for the fans, you don’t have the chance to play for, or make, the kind of money you do? Yeah, you can thank Tiger all you want for that, but it’s still the fans who show up to watch! You would think that once all of the Tiger controversies came to be, and the galleries were only a fraction of what they were, these guys would be a bit humbled. But no. Nothing changed.

In my opinion though, the Tiger mess is the point from which the PGA’s revelation stems. And not for nothing, but also in my opinion, that’s a slap in the face to the golf fan. Basically, the PGA is saying “Oh yeah, you fans…we didn’t give a crap about you for the most part. But now that you’re not showing up, we realize we need you. Sorry about that.” It’s like treating your spouse like crap. Then when they’re about to walk out on you, you start trying to fix things by doing the things you should have been doing all along! Good luck with that.

The PGA put all of their eggs in the Tiger basket because of his popularity. The galleries were packed, purses were larger, the PGA was making money and the sports popularity seemed to be at an all-time high. They didn’t have to do anything for the fans because they were already there! But then…disaster. Tiger is out and no one is paying attention any longer. Now what? They realize now they should treat the fans a little better? They understand now, without the fans, they don’t have a sport? Excuse me, but that’s crap.

We here at Golfstinks have mentioned many times in the past that the PGA just doesn’t do enough for the fans, as well as its own players. And when Tiger disappeared for a while, that point was proven. I didn’t know half the golfers I was seeing on TV. That’s sad! When I can name more NASCAR drivers (a sport I despise) than PGA golfers (a sport I am a fan of, as well as participate in)…well…there’s a problem.

So one of the PGA’s solutions is to allow cell phones on the course? That’s your answer?! I’ve been to exactly two PGA tournaments, and guess what? I took my cell phone to both!! Obviously I was courteous enough to turn the ringer off, but what are you really offering me? I’m bringing it anyway!

What I’m getting at here is, at least the PGA is making the attempt to do something. But it’s not even close to enough. Yeah, putting a microphone on some of the players is a halfway decent idea, but something tells me that will get old pretty quickly. There’s only so much they can have to say that I’m going to care about before it just becomes redundant and flat-out boring.

The PGA needs to take more drastic measures. Get the fans more involved. Make some autograph sessions or meet-and-greets a requirement after rounds. Encourage the players to toss a few balls into the crowds. Set-up some competitions just for fun. We’ve mentioned in the past a long-drive competition between some of the bigger hitters on tour. That’s fun and fan-friendly! What’s wrong? Some of the players don’t want to participate in that stuff? Well…then tell them they are more than welcome to find a new line of work.

The PGA needs to make it a point to show the fans they are priority #1. The tour will go on with or without a particular golfer. But it will not go on if there’s no one to watch. Like that spouse, if you don’t show appreciation, then before you know it, they’re gone. And let me tell you…allowing a cell phone in? If that’s the best you can come up with, that’s simply not going to cut it.

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: fan friendly, golf fans, PGA TOUR, phil mickelson, tiger woods

Are There Too Many Golf Courses?

April 12, 2010 | By Chris Chirico | 2 Comments

Can there ever be too many golf courses? (photo by Saskia2586 / CC BY 3.0)
Can there ever be too many golf courses? (photo by Saskia2586 / CC BY 3.0)

Now that The Masters is over I have to tell you, I am all golfed out. Honestly, I may have watched about a half-hour, in total, of the tournament. But between all of the coverage on ESPN and various other sports networks and news shows, specifically the Tiger coverage, I feel like I was in the galleries all four days! I don’t think I can watch another five minutes of a tournament for the rest of the year!

However, that does not curb my desire to get back out onto the many courses which my home state of Connecticut has to offer. But a couple of stories in my local news lately have me wondering…are there too many golf courses?

The obvious answer for one who loves to golf, especially those of us who enjoy playing different courses all the time, is “not a chance.” How can you have too many golf courses? After all, the old saying “variety is the spice of life” indeed equates to your golf life also. Maybe the more appropriate question wouldn’t be to ask if there are too many golf courses, but instead to ask, is a new golf course really necessary? Or, is there a better use for that land?

In my current hometown, a town of about 45,000, we have two nine-hole courses. Recently, the idea to use a piece of undeveloped public land to build another nine-hole course was proposed by a local developer. The Economic Development Committee approved the proposal, but many spoke out at a recent Common Council meeting. In favor of the course were some local business owners hoping the course brings more people into the city. However, many spoke out against the course. Some concerns were tax and rent payments (or lack thereof), privatization of public land, outside investors and the plan meeting environmental standards. However, one major concern asked, what if the course fails? You are left with nothing more than carved up land, which would make later development more challenging, and the city expected to foot the bill. One can see where the concern would be.

My personal opinion? There are already two nine-hole courses in town. Additionally, there are four eighteen-hole courses within ten miles. Is another nine-holer necessary? As for bringing people into the city, how many golfers regularly travel to other towns to play nine-holes, especially when the surrounding towns have eighteen-hole courses? Add to that the fact there are already two nine-hole courses in this town, then how much more business is the course actually going to generate?

This reminds me a bit of a situation from the town in which I used to live – my hometown (population of about 60,000). It offered one eighteen and two nine-hole courses. But when the idea to build a new middle school on the grounds of one of the nine-hole courses was proposed, it was met with some hostility. The course in question was, to put it lightly, a bombed-out disaster of a mortar range which I had the displeasure of playing exactly once and swore to myself to never play again. It was in fact, with no exaggeration, that bad.

But, the course was very popular with the senior crowd. It was flat, wide open and an easy course to walk if you chose. And not too mention, cheap. Due to its low (if any) maintenance costs and the popularity with seniors and first-timers, I’m sure the course made some money for the town. But the question actually was: What’s more important, keeping this crappy course around to satisfy a few people who have other options, or building a new, better, safer school, in a better, safer neighborhood for 1,200 students year-in and year-out?

To me, the answer here seems obvious – kill the course. But I guess there are some of us who believe the future of our children isn’t as important as having to spend an extra six bucks to play a different nine-hole course.

Now don’t get me wrong, being a golfer, I always looking forward to playing a new course and feel a new course is typically a great idea. But, we also have to consider the cost. Be it a risky investment at the cost of the taxpayer, environmental issues or the future of our young students. All of these issues, and then some, have to be addressed before we can truly learn the value of a golf course.

Filed Under: Golf Life, Health & Environment Tagged With: eighteen holes, environment, ESPN, nine holes, The Masters, tiger woods, too many golf courses

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Next Page »

Awards

Badges Badges Badges Best Mens Blogs Badges

Advertisements

GPI


 


Archives – Read all 1,000+ GolfStinks Posts!

Blogroll

  • Aussie Golfer
  • Black Girls Golf
  • Devil Ball Golf
  • Front9Back9 Golf Blog
  • Geoff Shackelford
  • Golf Blogger
  • Golf For Beginners
  • Golf Gear Geeks
  • Golf Girl's Diary
  • Golf News Net (GNN)
  • Golf Refugees
  • Golf State of Mind
  • Golfgal
  • My Daily Slice of Golf
  • Pillars of Golf
  • Ruthless Golf
  • The Breakfast Ball
  • The Grateful Golfer
  • UniqueGolfGears.com

Questions / Advertise

info@golfstinks.com

Disclaimers

See here

Privacy Policy

See here

Copyright © 2009-2024 GolfStinks.com - All rights reserved.