GolfStinks

A Golf Blog for the Rest of Us!

  • Home
  • About
  • Most Popular
  • Categories
    • Stinky Golfer Paradise
    • Golf Life
    • The Pro Tours
    • Reviews
    • The Economics of Golf
    • Golf Growth & Diversity
    • Health & Environment
    • Golf Destinations
  • Golf Terms
  • Newsletter

No Tiger, No Fans?

April 21, 2014 | By Chris Chirico | 4 Comments

I think we can all agree that when we are watching the PGA Tour, we are watching the highest level of professional golf we are likely to see.  And that probably goes double for a major.  Face it, the absolute worst player on the tour will still wipe the floor with most any of us.  These guys are simply the best.  So why is it that so many viewers need to have Tiger Woods there, or they’re not interested in watching?  Is a large collective of most of the best players in the world not good enough?

Obviously, I’m referring to The Masters and the fact that Tiger Woods did not play due to surgery (as well as Mickelson not making the cut).  The result?  The lowest ratings for a Masters tournament since 1993.  I wonder why this is?  I get that he is certainly the most popular player in the game, as well as arguably still the best.  But are that many people electing not to tune in if he’s not there?  What about all of the other great golfers who are there?  No love for Bubba?  Fowler?  McIlroy?

This is the reason why the PGA needs to do a better job of hyping more players on the tour.  Once the most hyped player doesn’t participate, despite the fact he hasn’t won the tournament since 2005, too many people no longer care.  So again, these are the greatest players in the world…but no one cares.  When there’s an NFL game in which Tom Brady or Peyton Manning isn’t involved, people still watch, right?  Why is it different for golf and golf tournaments?  Take a look at the numbers.  When you really look at final scores and the total number of strokes, the difference between first and thirtieth is only a matter of about three strokes per round.  Is that really much of a difference form a skill level standpoint?  I’m sorry, but it’s not.  So what exactly do these so-called fans think they’re missing?  It’s as if they are more caught up in the off-the-course Tiger hype than what he should be known for, which is golf.

Speaking of so-called fans, I saw an idiotic comment on another post proving my point.  This person claims they would rather watch Tiger shoot 74 than a “no name guy” shoot 70.  So basically you’re telling me, just because a specific golfer is playing, you would rather watch bad golf than a lesser named player having a better round?  I’m sorry, but that means you are not a fan of the game.

If anything, this should be an eye opener for the PGA.  After all, Tiger is not going to be around forever.  And if this is a sign of things to come when he does decide to hang up his spikes, then the tour is going to be in some real trouble.  They’d better get to work sooner rather than later.

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Bubba Watson, golf stinks, golfstinks, nfl, Peyton Manning, pga, PGA TOUR, Rickie Fowler, rory mcllroy, the masters, tiger woods, tom brady

A “New Idea” From The PGA Show

January 27, 2014 | By Chris Chirico | 2 Comments

1471956_772546839428973_1731289230_nFor a golf nut, the PGA Merchandise Show (or just about any golf show for that matter) is like being a kid in a candy store.  If you’re into everything golf, then it’s the place to be to check out the latest and greatest.  It’s like putting me at one of the big auto shows.  Just booths and booths, aisles and aisles, of new clubs, apparel, swing aids and all the other accessories involved in the game from all the big players in the industry.  It’s hard to not be excited for something like this.  But I’ve read that one of the bigger topics (as I suppose it is every year) to come out of this years show was the concern over, and how to stop, the decline of golfers year in and year out.

After experiencing major growth in the sport prior, the past eight years have not been kind to golf as a whole.  While participation is still on the decline, more courses continue to close than open.  So, as usual, the industry people are looking for answers to reverse the trend.  And when I first started reading up on one of their ideas, it sounded pretty good!  That is, until I read a little further…

Let’s start with this…”Hack Golf.”  Off the bat, it sounds interesting.  Being a hack myself (along with the majority of other golfers out there), I’m intrigued right from the start.  That is, until I read further.  Hack Golf (www.hackgolf.org) is an initiative started up by Taylor Made.  It’s a website to, more or less, open the lines of communication between the industry and the golfers themselves.  That in itself, is a good idea.  What bothers me is that it’s taken about eight years of decline before the industry seems to have thrown their hands up and finally said “I give up.  Maybe we should listen to what people have to say.”  Genius.

Now if that’s not bad enough, one of the solutions I see they are looking into, is to make the game simpler.  I am sure I am not the first person to say…I HATE this idea.  Make the cup fifteen inches?!  Seriously?  That’s almost as big as a basketball hoop!  Tee-up every shot?  Use bigger balls and special clubs?  Is it just me, or is this so typically American?  The game is too tough, so instead of encouraging someone to work hard, we dumb it down.

That being said, I still like the idea of reaching out to the golfers.  But as I look through the comments posted on there so far, most of it is the same stuff we hear on a regular basis – It’s too expensive, it takes too long to play, it needs to advance into the digital age, it’s too difficult, etc…  Now, some of these complaints are spot-on.  But at the same time, I think some golfers need to relax a bit.

From the standpoint of the industry, yeah…it’s too damn expensive.  Maybe these industry people need to realize that money is in fact an object to most people.  We’ve said before that every time you thumb through a golf magazine, almost everything advertised, whether it is golf-related or not, is high-end and expensive.  Equipment, apparel, courses…all high-end stuff.  There is nothing there for the budget-minded golfer.  It just fuels that “Rich man’s game” stereo-type that keeps people away before they even give it a chance.  And on the rare occasion a new course does open, that’s expensive also!  The greens fees are simply too much.  Here in CT, the average course is roughly $45 for 18 holes.  But it seems that any new course that come along is well above that putting it out of reach for most.

Now, from the standpoint of the golfer, we need to relax a bit.  Is the game time-consuming?  It sure is!  But you know that going in, so what are you complaining about?  If you don’t have the time to play, then play nine holes or stay home.  Someone else will gladly take your place.  And as far as bringing the game into the digital age?  We’re asking for trouble here.  I have news for you – GPS slows the game down.  Keeping your score on your smartphone slows the game down.  Pulling up a golf app mid-round slows the game down.  If you need your smartphone to help you keep score because you find it too difficult to use a pencil, then you need to try another sport.  But you complain that the game moves too slow already?  Understand…sometimes technology is a step backward.  Find the game too hard?  Here’s a novel idea…practice!  If it’s that important to you, then work harder!  But, no…instead, people would rather complain that the game is too tough hoping that someone will make it easier for them by making the hole bigger.

In my opinion, golf somewhat needs to struggle for a while.  Courses need to close.  Companies need to go out of business.  The industry as a whole needs to suffer a bit.  After all, the industry as a whole is what caused so many prices to rise to untouchable levels.  And in turn, the culture changes for the golfers…much of it for the negative.

The fault lies on both ends.  The industry has made it so the game is simply out of reach financially for many people.  But golfers have also made it so expectations are unrealistic and the image of the game is negative.  The fact that there is a very large portion of golfers who play this game for no reason other than fun, seems like it has been lost on the industry (as well as many “serious” golfers) for quite a long time.

This is the message that we here at golfstinks.com are trying to convey.  It’s what we are all about.  We’ve spent the past three-and-a-half years promoting the idea that golf is a game…you should have fun playing it.  Take a look through our hundreds of previous posts to see what we mean.  I’ll use myself as an example – I don’t have the most expensive clubs.  My putter was free.  I don’t spend a lot of money on my golf apparel or equipment.  I play an expensive course every once in a while, otherwise I keep it pretty average.  I’ve never paid for a lesson.  I’ve never hurried through a round.  I’m not in competition with anyone.  I don’t even know what my handicap is or how to figure it out.  But do you know what I do?  I play golf and I have fun.  Everyone should try it sometime.

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: Golf Life, Stinky Golfer Paradise Tagged With: golf industry, golf stinks, golfstinks, Hack Golf, org, pga, PGA merchandise show, Taylor Made, www.hackgolf

Finally…A Birdie Hits The Golf Links

July 1, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | 4 Comments

Really?  Is that all it takes to become an internet sensation?  Is this all I would have to do to go from a relative nobody to getting a story on ESPN?  I’ve flipped the bird to many people on many occasions, so why not me?  Oooohhh…I have to do it on a golf course, during a tournament, I guess.  D.H. Lee must have just beaten me to the punch.

So it finally happened in golf.  A pro finally had enough of a heckler in the gallery and sent a message.  And I’m not talking one of those flipping out about a camera click messages.  I’m talking the “We’re #1!” message.  The old one-gun salute.  We’ve seen it in other sports – remember Jack McDowell?  We’ve even seen baseball and basketball players run up into the crowd to go after fans (Ron Artest and Chad Kreuter come to mind).  But this is new to golf.  If a camera doesn’t click or someone doesn’t whisper during a swing, then there is almost no interaction with the gallery, either positively or negatively, whatsoever.  So what is the PGA to do with this?  Do they suspend him?  Do they fine him?  You know the PGA can’t have any of their players disrespecting their fans like that.  Or…can they?

I can’t be the only one who thinks golf could use a bad boy, right?  And I don’t mean a bad boy off-the-course such as a Tiger Woods or John Daly.  I mean an on-the-course bad guy that you want to hate, but at the same time you kind of root for because he’s different than every other boring face in the crowd.  Now I also don’t mean the PGA should encourage this kind of behavior, because it can get old fast, especially if too many players are getting in on it.  But if they take a guy like Lee, maybe pull him to the side and tell him something to the effect of:

“Pssst…hey, D.H.  That little act you pulled last weekend sure brought us a little more attention than usual.  I’m not telling you to do it again.  But…I’m also not telling you not to do it again either.  Maybe not the finger next time, but a little something else, ya know?  I promise we’ll make it worth your while.”

Want to get people to tune into an event that normally doesn’t quite get the ratings?  Want to make people interested in the highlights from a smaller tournament that normally just kind of slips under the radar?  D.H. Lee could be your guy!

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours, Uncategorized Tagged With: Chad Kreuter, D.H. Lee, golf stinks, golfstinks, Jack McDowell, John Daly, pga, Ron Artest, tiger woods

The New Breed Of Golf Official

May 6, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | Leave a Comment

Imagine you’re watching a baseball game.  Let’s say it’s around the seventh inning or so, and the umpires suddenly call a timeout and gather in discussion off to the side of the field.  A few minutes later it’s announced that back in the fourth inning there was a balk that the umpires missed and the penalty needs to be enforced.  So now, the runners on second and third jam your pitcher got out of unscathed earlier is not to be.  The other team is awarded the run they would have had due to the runner on third base, and now it’s a whole new ball game.  Does this sound ridiculous?  Absolutely.  Now imagine how much more ridiculous it would sound if the umpires themselves had nothing to do with it.  Rather, someone watching the game on TV called it in.

As ridiculous as it sounds, we all know what happened with Tiger at The Masters.  But did you know it happened again this weekend?  That’s right, this time to Sergio Garcia.  Apparently, Sergio marked his ball on the green, but didn’t put it back exactly from where he picked it up.  And once again, it took someone watching on TV to call a penalty. OK, once is a fluke.  But twice in three weeks?  This makes me wonder a few things:

1. If I was to notice a rules violation, who the heck would I call?  I get that in the Tiger incident, the caller was a former rules official, so he probably had a direct line to the guys at the tournament.  But just some average, everyday TV viewer…I wouldn’t know where to start!  Do I call the network?  Do I call the course?  And who would I even ask for?  What would I say?  “Hi, my name is Stinky Golfer Chris and I’d like to report a rules violation I just saw on TV.”  Yeah, because that sounds legit.

2. If it’s taking television viewers to call in after catching violations, how much are the officials missing that we (and they) don’t know about?  In my opinion, these violations were pretty blatant.  Seriously, you mean to tell me Tiger didn’t know he couldn’t drop his ball three or four feet away from his original spot?  Or Sergio didn’t realize he was putting his ball in a different place than where he marked it?  C’mon now.  Yet, no one on the course caught these at the time?

3. If they are legitimate mistakes made by the players, and they are completely unaware, how can you penalize them after the fact?  I would think a two-stroke penalty after the fact hurts more because it would affect the decisions the player would make had they known at the time.  My feeling is that once the player takes his next stroke, it’s too late.  The officials should have caught it then.

4. How does this happen in the first place?  If I’m playing with my buddies, we all notice if someone obviously puts their ball where it doesn’t belong?  We don’t call each other on it, but it’s noticeable.  If we see it, how don’t the people who are paid to?  What exactly are the officials looking at?  This isn’t a fast paced game that’s hard to keep up with.  We’re not talking an NBA game here.  We’re talking golf.

So two incidents in three weeks.  Is it just a fluke?  Or is it going to become a glaring flaw in the way golf tournaments are monitored and officiated.  I’d like to think it’s a fluke.  I mean, mistakes happen.  It could be just a couple of errors occurring close together.  But  either way, after two quick incidents, it may be time for the PGA to step in to try and prevent a third.

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: baseball, golf official, golf stinks, golfstinks, pga, sergio garcia, the masters, tiger woods

Would Sex Sell The LPGA?

February 25, 2013 | By Chris Chirico | Leave a Comment

As a lifelong sports fan, I can understand what it is about women’s sports that most fans don’t particulary enjoy.  Let’s face it, the speed, power and physicality of women’s sports are simply no match for the men’s games.  I’m not in any way trying to disrespect what these women do.  They are fantastic athletes; are great at the sports they play; and deserve all the credit and any attention they get because if it.  But in comparison to their male counterparts, outside of tennis, it just doesn’t match up.  That being said…I don’t understand why the LPGA doesn’t get the same recognition as the PGA.

A perfect example is probably the WNBA.  Have you ever watched a WNBA game?  These women are great basketball players and great athletes.  But when compared to the speed and physicality of an NBA game, the women’s game seems to look just a bit dull.  But it’s not just basketball.  The same can be said about women’s softball vs. baseball, women’s hockey, boxing and what seems to be the newest fad…women in UFC or MMA fighting.  Again, outside of tennis, no matter the sport, the women’s version just doesn’t seem to match up.

But lets look at golf for a second.  The game is slow.  It doesn’t much require the player to be a superior athlete.  And the only time any real power is demonstrated is off the tee, and that really only matters if you’re a spectator live at the event witnessing it first-hand.  On TV, you can’t tell.  You can’t judge the power of a golf swing via your flat-screen.  The only reason you know how far a ball went on TV is because the announcer told you.  The women of the LPGA are just as skilled as the men.  They are just as accurate.  They have as firm a grasp on the game as the men do.  They just don’t have the power that the men do.  But if that isn’t translated through TV, then what’s the problem?  What does the PGA have that the LPGA doesn’t?  Just the longer drives as far as I can tell.  So what would make the LPGA more attractive?  Or…did I just give away the answer?  Attractiveness.

It seems to me that, especially in recent years, when you want to promote anything related to female athletes, you sell the women…not the athletes.  Is it shallow?  Absolutely.  Do I like the idea of it?  Not even a little bit.  Does it work?  Well…that can be argued, but lets just say it doesn’t not work.  Look at the previously mentioned tennis.  It’s quite possibly the only sport where fans care just as much about the men as the women.  There are some examples to learn from here.  It started long ago with the battle of the sexes between Bobby Riggs and Billie Jean King.  It continued when, forgive me as I’m not a tennis fan and don’t remember the year, Wimbledon somehow allowed “commoners” into the stands and the men began hootin’ and hollerin’ for, I believe it was Gabriela Sabitini.  Fast forward to an average player on the tour becoming the most popular player in the world (albeit for the wrong reason)…Anna Kournikova.  And next thing you know, every tennis player promoted is either named Williams or is a blonde-haired beauty.  Convenient, right?

So does the LPGA need to take that route?  Should the powers-that-be in the LPGA come to Natalie Gulbis and say “A little less MasterCard, a little more Maxim.”  Now I know that some female golfers are no strangers to a swimsuit, but maybe that’s just not enough.  Sponsor exemptions are there for what reason?  To get their “hot” property out in front of a few cameras.  Again, I don’t like the idea.  I want to see good athletes compete for their athletic ability, not for their looks.  But if it’s their looks that bring attention to the game, then who am I to say what’s right and what’s wrong?

All I’m saying is that it has worked to bring some attention to other sports.  It most definitely is a shallow way to do so.  But in the end, it could possibly bring the viewership for which the sports are looking.  If it brings in new fans, great!  But if it doesn’t, or if those new fans don’t stick around, does it leave a black eye on the sport?  Well, it sure didn’t seem to for tennis…quite the opposite actually.  But that doesn’t automatically equal success for the LPGA.  Maybe they just wait on another phenom.  Maybe a new star will rise and not decide to take on the men of the PGA before she even has any success on the LPGA Tour.  Or, maybe they just start a lingerie golf league.  Want to talk about shallow?

Swing ’til you’re happy!

Filed Under: The Pro Tours Tagged With: Anna Kournikova, Gabriela Sabitini, golf stinks, golfstinks, LPGA, Maxim, MMA, Natalie Gulbis, NBA, pga, sex sells, tennis, UFC, Wimbledon, WNBA, women's sports

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Awards

Badges Badges Badges Best Mens Blogs Badges

Advertisements

GPI


 


Archives – Read all 1,000+ GolfStinks Posts!

Blogroll

  • Aussie Golfer
  • Black Girls Golf
  • Devil Ball Golf
  • Front9Back9 Golf Blog
  • Geoff Shackelford
  • Golf Blogger
  • Golf For Beginners
  • Golf Gear Geeks
  • Golf Girl's Diary
  • Golf News Net (GNN)
  • Golf Refugees
  • Golf State of Mind
  • Golfgal
  • My Daily Slice of Golf
  • Pillars of Golf
  • Ruthless Golf
  • The Breakfast Ball
  • The Grateful Golfer
  • UniqueGolfGears.com

Questions / Advertise

info@golfstinks.com

Disclaimers

See here

Privacy Policy

See here

Copyright © 2009-2024 GolfStinks.com - All rights reserved.